Legal Opinion

Eason v. Aetna Life Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 4, 1963No. Civ. 26140PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFox, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this action to recover $7,000 allegedly due to her as the beneficiary under a contributory group life insurance policy issued by defendant Aetna Life Insurance Company, hereinafter referred to as Aetna, through defendant Southwestern Engineering Co., hereinafter referred to as Sweco. Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of plaintiff.

Carl Eason, the husband of plaintiff, Loras L. Eason, was employed by defendant Sweco throughout the year of 1958 until the time of his death on April 19, 1958. In December of 1957, Sweco negotiated with Aetna for the issuance of a group…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Boseman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Naify v. Pacific Indemnity Co.California Supreme Court · 1938
  4. People v. GouldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Butler v. NeppleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Elfstrom v. New York Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  2. White v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API