Legal Opinion

Ellis v. Jones

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 29, 1932No. Docket No. 529PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

is an action for damages for fraudulent representations in the sale of real estate. The plaintiffs exchanged certain real property owned by the defendants Jones, the defendant Stockwell acting as the agent of both parties and also acting as escrow-holder. The principal misrepresentation relied on was that the property received by the plaintiffs was being rented for $200 per month, when in truth and in fact it was only rented for about $100 per month. While the original contract between the parties was dated December 29, 1925, the exchange appears to have been completed on February 1, 1926, as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Victor Oil Co. v. DrumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ferguson v. KochCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Calmon v. SarrailleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Great Western Gold Co. v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Landis v. MorrisseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. San Diego Hospice v. County of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  2. Gloria L. Schrader v. Prudential Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1960
  3. Chung v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  4. M. G. Chamberlain & Co. v. SimpsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  5. McNulty v. CoppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API