Legal Opinion
Landis v. Morrissey
California Supreme Court
Decided March 15, 1886No. 9278PublishedCited by 17 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
The question in this case arises on an offer to introduce certain testimony. The point presented is to be determined upon the allegations of the complaint and the denials of the answer. There are several counts in the complaint, all of which were answered, but as the counts and the answers to them are the same as to the point to be decided, we shall present here only one of each.
The plaintiffs aver: —
“1. That during all the several periods of time hereinafter stated, said plaintiffs were, and still are, partners, doing business in said city and county of San Francisco, under the firm name of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Frisch v. CalerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Coles v. SoulsbyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
- Hanna v. MillsNew York Supreme Court · 1839
- Lightner v. MenzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Nelson v. MurrayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- El Reno Electric Light and Telephone Co. v. JennisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1897
- Gardner v. ShreveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- People's State Bank v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1930
- Mott v. MinorCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.