Legal Opinion

Chung v. Johnston

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 18, 1954No. Civ. 20135PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by defendants from a judgment which decrees that plaintiff convey to defendants a parcel of realty; and that plaintiff have judgment against defendants for $7,086.34, secured by a lien on the property conveyed.

Plaintiff is an educated Korean but does not speak the English language fluently. Defendants are husband and wife; the husband, when he acted alone, will be referred to as defendant. Since 1946 defendant had acted as plaintiff’s broker in buying and selling real estate and in investing his funds. The claim of plaintiff is that defendants induced him to convey to them a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. French v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Solon v. LichtensteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Baines v. ZuiebackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  4. Mazzenga v. RossoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Shermaster v. California Home Building Loan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Liodas v. SahadiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Grunwald-Marx, Inc. v. Los Angeles Joint BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Stevens v. MarcoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Royal Air Properties, Inc., a Corporation, Harold L. Heathman and Madge I. Heathman, His Wife v. R. Philip SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  5. Boyd v. BevilacquaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API