State v. Holley
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, Judge.
In Case No. 76CR1854 defendant contends that there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s finding that he intended to kill when he shot Moore with the shotgun. There is no merit in this contention. An intent to kill “may be inferred from the nature of the assault, the manner in which it is made, the conduct of the parties, and other relevant circumstances.” State v. Revels, 227 N.C. 34, 36, 40 S.E. 2d 474, 475 (1946). It must frequently be proved by circumstantial evidence, State v. Jones, 18 N.C. App. 531, 197 S.E. 2d 268 (1973), and “is ordinarily shown by proof of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. ThackerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. EppleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
- State v. GreeneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- State v. CottenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- State v. LiddellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. LillyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
- State v. HillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016