Legal Opinion

State v. Lilly

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 2009No. COA08-421PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Defendant James Edward Lilly appeals his convictions of injury to real property and discharging a weapon into occupied property. On appeal, defendant primarily contends that the indictment for the charge of injury to real property, which incorrectly described the lessee of the real property as its owner, fatally varied from the evidence presented at trial. We hold that the indictment was sufficient because it properly identified the lawful possessor of the damaged property, and, therefore, no fatal variance occurred.

Facts

At trial, the State’s evidence tended to show the following…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. State v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. State v. KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1996
  3. State v. FowlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  4. State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  2. State v. JefferiesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  3. State v. EllisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2014
  4. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016
  5. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API