Legal Opinion

State v. Hill

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 3, 2016No. 15-675PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIETZ, Judge.

*343 Defendant Caleb Hill appeals his convictions on multiple counts of breaking and entering, larceny, and injury to real property based on a series of break-ins at businesses in a shopping center in Chapel Hill.

Hill first argues that the trial court erred by failing to exclude the testimony of two law enforcement officers who identified him in surveillance video from the shopping center. As explained below, the officers were familiar with Hill and recognized distinct features of Hill's face, posture, and gait that would not have been evident to the jurors. Hill's appearance also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  3. State v. Gayton-BarbosaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
  4. State v. MasonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. SpiveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. McNairCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2017
  2. State v. NickensCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  3. State v. YoungCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. State v. CozartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  5. State v. CozartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API