Legal Opinion

State v. Hart

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 8, 1980No. 797SC304PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Defendant first assigns as error the trial court’s refusal to allow his motion to dismiss. Defendant asserts that all of the State’s evidence was exculpatory, and for that reason the motion *482to dismiss should have been allowed. See State v. Johnson, 261 N.C. 727, 136 S.E. 2d 84 (1964). We agree with defendant’s analysis of Johnson, but find the facts in this case distinguishable.

Officer Villalobos testified that defendant exclaimed to him that he had shot and killed his wife; that he removed a .32 caliber pistol from defendant’s hand; that the bed in the room where the victim was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mullaney v. WilburSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. State v. JenningsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State v. TomblinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  5. State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. State v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API