Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1990No. 8929SC1143PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Judge.'

I

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in requiring defendant to file with the court a written notice of intent to rely upon self-defense and by telling the jury venire of defendant’s intent to rely upon this defense. Defendant did not object to the written statement of intent relative to self-defense. No North Carolina statute requires a defendant to give notice of an intent to assert “self-defense” as a defense. {See, e.g., G.S. § 15A-959 which requires defendants to file notice of reliance upon an insanity defense.) The defendant argues that by telling the jury…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  4. State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. State v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API