State v. Ross
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
LEWIS, Judge.'
I
Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in requiring defendant to file with the court a written notice of intent to rely upon self-defense and by telling the jury venire of defendant’s intent to rely upon this defense. Defendant did not object to the written statement of intent relative to self-defense. No North Carolina statute requires a defendant to give notice of an intent to assert “self-defense” as a defense. {See, e.g., G.S. § 15A-959 which requires defendants to file notice of reliance upon an insanity defense.) The defendant argues that by telling the jury…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
- State v. HintonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. RossCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
- State v. RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991