Legal Opinion

State v. Ross

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided September 4, 1990No. 8929SC1143Published

1Opinion of the Court

395 S.E.2d 148 (1990)

100 N.C. App. 207

STATE of North Carolina

v.

James Keith ROSS.

No. 8929SC1143.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina.

September 4, 1990.

Atty. Gen. Lacy H. Thornburg by Sp. Deputy Atty. Gen. Charles M. Hensey, Raleigh, for the State.

Appellate Defender Malcolm Ray Hunter, Jr. by Asst. Appellate Defender Gordon Widenhouse, Raleigh, for defendant.

LEWIS, Judge.

I

Defendant first argues that the trial court erred in requiring defendant to file with the court a written notice of intent to rely upon self defense and by telling the jury venire of defendant's intent to rely upon this defense.…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. OdomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. Wardius v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. State v. AlbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  5. State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API