Todd v. Creech
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
BALEY, Judge.
In ruling upon a defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, the trial court must consider all the plaintiff’s evidence in the light most favorable to him, giving to plaintiff the benefit of all reasonable inferences and resolving all conflicts in his favor. Bowen v. Gardner, 275 N.C. 363, 168 S.E. 2d 47. The motion may be granted only if the evidence is insufficient as a matter of law to support a verdict for the plaintiff. Younts v. Insurance Co., 281 N.C. 582, 189 S.E. 2d 137; Kelly v. Harvester Co., 278 N.C. 153, 179 S.E. 2d 396. Applying this standard to the case at bar, we…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Bowen v. GardnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. . DunningSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Younts v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- State v. . PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1888
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Jackson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- Myrick v. CooleyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State v. GarrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Prior v. PruettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
- Russ v. CauseyDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.