Russ v. Causey
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
LOUISE W. FLANAGAN, Chief Judge.
This matter comes before the court on defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (DE # 52). Plaintiffs have responded, and defendants have replied. In this posture, the issues raised are ripe for ruling. For the reasons that follow, the court grants in part and denies in part defendants’ motion for summary judgment. 1
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Plaintiffs Russ and Gause are the widow and the daughter, respectively, of Mr. Gladwyn T. Russ, Jr. Defendants are the former Sheriff of New Hanover County and a…
2Cases cited87 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Weigle v. Pifer ex rel. City of Vienna Police DepartmentDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2015
- Simmons v. Corizon Health, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2015
- Gates v. Black Hills Health Care SystemsDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2014
- Cardall v. ThompsonDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2012
- BELTON v. FLINTDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.