Legal Opinion
Commercial & Farmers National Bank v. Edwards
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 6, 1979No. Civ. 54778PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FILES, P. J.
Pending here are appeals by opposing parties arising out of the same superior court action. Each side has moved to dismiss the other’s appeal. These motions require us to decide (a) the timeliness of defendant’s appeal from a postjudgment order denying attorney fees under Civil Code section 1717 and (b) the applicability of rule 3(c), California Rules of Court, to plaintiff’s subsequent appeal from the judgment.
We have concluded that defendant has taken a timely appeal from a postjudgment order, and that rule 3(c) did not reopen plaintiff’s time for appealing from the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- T.E.D. Bearing Co. v. Walter E. Heller & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1974
- Associated Convalescent Enterprises v. Carl Marks & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
- Beneficial Standard Properties, Inc. v. ScharpsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- City of Los Angeles v. AalbersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
3Cited by10 opinions
- Lakin v. Watkins Associated IndustriesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Grant v. List & LathropCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. GradowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- CC-California Plaza Associates v. Paller & GoldsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Sciarrotta v. Teaford Custom Remodeling, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.