Legal Opinion

CC-California Plaza Associates v. Paller & Goldstein

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 19, 1996No. A071355PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HAERLE, J.

I. Introduction

These are two appeals from litigation involving alleged defective construction on a Walnut Creek office building. In one appeal, the owner of the building and the plaintiff below, CC-Califomia Plaza Associates (Cal Plaza), appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted a nonsuit against it and in favor of the defendant subcontractor on the project, Paller & Goldstein (Paller). Via separate moving papers, Paller moves to dismiss that appeal as untimely. In the second appeal, Paller appeals from the trial court’s postjudgment order denying it…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Hauter v. ZogartsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Pruyn v. Agricultural InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Peter Culley & Associates v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Fundamental Investment Growth Shelter Realty Fund v. GradowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Fountain Valley Chateau Blanc Homeowner's Ass'n v. Department of Veterans AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Torres v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  3. Guseinov v. BurnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  4. Erickson v. R.E.M. Concepts, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Davis v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API