Legal Opinion

Sciarrotta v. Teaford Custom Remodeling, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 19, 1980No. Civ. 21068PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McDANIEL, J.

In this case we are called upon to decide whether to apply section 1717 of the Civil Code in favor of a promisor who sued successfully to enforce a right under the contract not related to the provision providing for fees in favor of the promisee. Here a standard *446printed form used by the parties as a memorial of their building contract provided for such fees to be awarded to the defendant building contractor should it be forced to sue to recover “the contract price” due under the contract. The action in the trial court, however, was brought by the owner plaintiffs for an…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Reynolds Metals Co. v. AlpersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. International Industries, Inc. v. OlenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Stout v. TurneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Associated Convalescent Enterprises v. Carl Marks & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1973
  5. San Luis Obispo Bay Properties, Inc. v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Myers Building Industries, Ltd. v. Interface Technology, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1993
  2. Sears v. BaccaglioCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  3. United States ex rel. Reed v. CallahanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  4. Boyd v. Oscar Fisher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Milman v. ShukhatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API