Legal Opinion
Aunt Hack Ridge Estates, Inc. v. Planning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 1, 1970PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, C. J.
The plaintiff submitted a plan for a subdivision to the defendant commission which it refused to approve because the plan did not provide an open space for a park or playground. The plain tiff brought this action in the Superior Court seeking a declaratory judgment and ancillary injunctive relief. The questions to which answers are sought are: (1) “Whether Section 2.3 of the Regulations of the Planning Commission of the City of Danbury is unconstitutional”; and (2) “Whether that portion of Section 8-25 of the Connecticut General Statutes, which pertains to open spaces for parks and…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Adams v. RubinowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
- State v. StoddardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Jennings v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Whittaker v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Kamhi v. Town of YorktownNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Caldor's, Inc. v. Bedding Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF JAMES CITY CTY. v. RoweSupreme Court of Virginia · 1975
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.