Legal Opinion

Stadum v. Norman County

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided November 16, 1993No. C8-93-733PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

Appellant Karen M. Stadum challenges the trial court’s determination that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction to review her breach of contract claims against the county. This appeal is from an order for dismissal of appellant’s declaratory judgment action. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Appellant began her employment with Norman County in 1977. Appellant worked as a secretary for one of the district court judges. A second judge, replacing the first judge, decided he did not need a secretary. Appellant received a letter stating her employment with the county was terminated…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Larson v. New Richland Care CenterCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
  3. Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  4. Herubin v. FinnCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  5. Manteuffel v. City of North St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API