Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of Minnesota
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANDALL, Judge
Appellant challenges the district court’s decision that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over appellant’s breach of contract claim and challenges the district court’s subsequent dismissal of appellant’s breach of contract claim and grant of judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) to respondent. Respondent asserts that even if the district court erred in determining that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction, respondent was still entitled to JNOV, a new trial, or remittitur of damages. We affirm on all issues.
FACTS
The University of Minnesota employed appellant…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- ZumBerge v. Northern States Power Co.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1992
- Federal-Hoffman, Inc. v. FacklerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Issaenko v. University of MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2014
- Stephens v. Board of Regents of University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- City of Minneapolis v. MeldahlCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Williams v. BOARD OF REGENTS OF UNIV.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- Maye v. University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.