Legal Opinion

Larson v. New Richland Care Center

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 20, 1995No. C1-95-996, C7-95-999PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HARTEN, Judge.

Aynn Larson brought suit in district court under the whistleblower statute challenging her employment termination. The district court denied employer New Richland Care Center’s (NRCC) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and its motion for summary judgment. NRCC now brings an interlocutory appeal challenging jurisdiction, claiming that a petition for writ of cer-tiorari was Larson’s sole procedural remedy. NRCC also petitions for discretionary review, claiming that the applicable statute of limitations bars Larson’s suit. We affirm the district…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Frost-Benco Electric Ass'n v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  3. Wild v. RarigSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Ging v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Microsoft Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
  2. Wallin v. Minnesota Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Hayes v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Minnesota, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  4. Mowry v. YoungCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
  5. Boelter v. City of Coon RapidsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1999

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API