Legal Opinion
Dahl v. Wunderlich
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 15, 1935No. 30,226PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Certiorari to review an order of the industrial commission. The issue before us is whether at the time of injury the employe was working for Wunderlich, relator, or Preston, respondent. The referee found Preston to be such employer, but upon appeal the commission unanimously found that Wunderlich was such and made an award in conformity with that finding. An exhaustive memorandum is attached to the commission’s formal award.
Relator is a road contractor possessing a great deal of road machinery and equipment. He maintained a camp at Brookston, this state, under the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Hull v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Herron v. Coolsaet Bros.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- McNamara v. . LeipzigNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Murray v. . Union Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Barnes v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- St. Claire v. Minnesota Harbor Service, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1962
- Yoselowitz v. Peoples Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1938
- Turner v. Schumacher Motor Express, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Crawford v. Duluth, Missabe & Iron Range Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.