Legal Opinion

Phillips v. Parker

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 1990No. 19950PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The determinative issue in this case is whether the complaint and the allegations made therein are subject to the arbitration clause contained in a written agreement between the parties. We conclude that despite an attempted avoidance of the agreement, because of the nature of the dispute and the allegations asserted, the complaint is, at least in part, dependent upon the terms of the agreement. Evidentiary reliance upon an agreement containing an arbitration clause requires arbitration of the dispute. Therefore, we reverse the decision of the district court and order arbitration.

The…

3Cases cited6 opinions

  1. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Kennedy & Mitchell, Inc. v. Anadarko Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1988
  3. Exber, Inc. v. Sletten Construction CompanyNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Peck v. Title USA Ins. Corp.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
  5. International Ass'n of Firefighters, Local 1285 v. City of Las VegasNevada Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ellison v. California State Automobile Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Kindred v. Second Judicial District Court of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Lowe Enterprises Residential Partners, L.P. v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State Ex Rel. Masto v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. CT.Nevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. Second Judicial District CourtNevada Supreme Court · 2009

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API