Legal Opinion

Kindred v. Second Judicial District Court of Nevada

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 2000No. 34084PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

Before beginning her employment with A.G. Edwards & Sons (“Edwards”), petitioner Robin Kindred (“Kindred”) completed and signed two separate agreements. Both agreements contained an arbitration clause that required Kindred to arbitrate any disputes related to her employment. Kindred later filed a complaint in the district court. Edwards sought to compel arbitration, and the district court ruled that all of Kindred’s claims were subject to arbitration. For the reasons discussed herein, we conclude that Kindred appropriately seeks relief from this court by a writ of mandamus. Based on…

3Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Wright v. Universal Maritime Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by35 opinions

  1. Burch v. Second Judicial District Court of the State of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Gonski v. Second Judicial District Court Ex Rel. County of WashoeNevada Supreme Court · 2010
  3. DR Horton, Inc. v. GreenNevada Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Cayanan v. Citi Holdings, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
  5. H., R. McC. v. W., L. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1906

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API