Young v. Harris-Cortner Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McKinney
It is said that, notwithstanding the false recitations in the receipts, 'the defendants are nevertheless holders in due Course for value, since the evidence does not show that they acquired said receipts “dishonestly.”
We can conceive how the defendants might have acquired these receipts in good faith, notwithstanding they knew that they contained false statements. Hence the bare abstract statement that the defendants did not acquire said receipts in good faith, because of their knowledge of their false recitations, was not correct. But, when such false recitations are considered in connection…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Lieberman v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
- Fox v. CortnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
- Cartwright v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
- National Bank of Commerce v. ChatfieldTennessee Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by8 opinions
- Handley Motor Co. v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- War Finance Corp. v. ReadyCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925
- First National Bank v. HowardCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1957
- Marlin v. MerrillCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
- Cole v. Atlanta Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.