Legal Opinion

Lieberman v. Clark

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 26 opinions

FROM FENTRESS. Appeal in error from tbe Circuit Court of Fentress County. — D. L. Laindsden, Judge. •

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

This action was brought in the circuit court of Fen-tress county in replevin, by defendants in error, to re-. *121coyer of plaintiffs in error forty-five logs. Tbe case was tried before Hon. D. L. Lansden, chancellor, sitting as circuit judge, without the intervention of a jury. He rendered a judgment in favor of Clark and others against Lieberman, Loveman & O’Brien and the estate of Hizar Beaty (J. T. Wheeler, administrator), and the latter alone appealed.

There was evidently a purpose on the part of Hizar Beaty, in taking the logs, to compel defendants in error to try the title to the land on…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Core v. FaupelWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Cooper v. WatsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Halleck v. MixerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
  4. Sullivan v. . SullivanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  5. Stockwell v. . PhelpsNew York Court of Appeals · 1866

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Kittel v. StegerTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  2. East Coast Lumber Co. v. Ellis-Young Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1908
  3. Pick v. Fordyce Co-Op Credit Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Bensdorff v. UihleinTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Moffitt v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1946

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API