Handley Motor Co. v. Wood
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtPabkeR, J.
All tbe evidence shows that all the transactions as to tbe sale of tbe new Ford automobile described in tbe complaint between tbe plaintiff and James P. Junghans, Jr., and tbe delivery of it by tbe plaintiff to Junghans took place in tbe District of Columbia. Therefore, tbe sale in its substantive features is governed by tbe laws of tbe District of Columbia, and such laws on tbe doctrine of comity in the forum will be enforced in North Carolina, unless contrary to the public policy of this State. Price v. Goodman, 226 N.C. 223, 37 S.E. 2d 592; 11 Am. Jur., Conflict of Laws, Sec. 140.
Tbe…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Keen v. ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Cowdrey v. VandenburghSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Keen v. . ParkerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
- Lance v. Butler.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Ellison v. HunsingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Hawkins v. M & J FINANCE CORP.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Wilson v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- King Homes, Inc. v. BrysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Murray v. Bensen Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.