Legal Opinion

Cartwright v. Smith

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1900PublishedCited by 8 opinions

PROM SHELBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Sbelby County. J. S. Galloway, J.

1Opinion of the Court

.McAlistKR. J.

This is an action of replevin coninienced before a Justice of the Peace, to obtain possession of three mules and a cow. On appeal to the Circuit Court the defendant’s counsel moved to quash the writ upon the ground that the affidavit is insufficient in this, that it failed to state that -defendant had seized or detained the property.

It is true the Code, in prescribing what shall be stated in the affidavit, does provide that it shall state “that the defendant has seized or that he detains” the property to be replevied. Code (Shannon), §5130. But this exception, in analogy to…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lieberman v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Gentry v. Betty Lou BakeriesTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Pickard v. BerrymanCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1939
  4. Young v. Harris-Cortner Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Braly v. RagsdaleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API