Legal Opinion
Bartels v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided December 22, 1938No. 8868PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIBLEY, Circuit Judge.
The case concerns the proper application, of Subsection (s) of Sect. 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. Sect. 203(s)'. .Benno Bartels as a farmer applied for -a composition and extension of his debts and his petition was approved and referred to the Conciliator. At the creditors’ meeting Bartels expressed a willingness to pay in full if given time, and proposed to work his farm himself and to apply the proceeds of the crops to his debts, selling and paying over at once property not needed on the farm. Theretofore he had let it out on shares because he had hurt his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Baxter v. Savings Bank of Utica, NYCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1936
- Borgelt v. BohneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
- Massey v. Farmers & Merchants Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1938
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wilson v. Alliance Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
- Federal Land Bank of Berkeley v. NalderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
- Paradise Land & Livestock Co. v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
- Gray v. Union Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- In re BicknellDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1942
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.