Legal Opinion

Paradise Land & Livestock Co. v. Federal Land Bank

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided December 22, 1939No. 1867PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUXMAN, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Paradise Land & Livestock Company, herein called the debtor, is a farming corporation, operating in Cache County, Utah. The debtor filed its petition in the United States District Court for the District of Utah, under Section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203, asking for a composition or extension of its debts under the Act.

It listed the following debts: To the Federal Land Bank of Berkeley, California, an indebtedness of $61,777.20; to the J. D. Harding Estate, $10,000; unsecured judgment, $408; Farm Credit Administration, $8,00Q. It scheduled…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance v. BartelsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. Bartels v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  4. Cresap v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1938
  5. Sullivan v. TofflemoyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Springfield v. HansenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940
  2. In Re CasaudoumecqDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942
  3. Paradise Land & Livestock Co. v. Federal Land Bank of BerkeleyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1945
  4. Federal Land Bank v. HowellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941
  5. Paradise Land & Livestock Co. v. Federal Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1941

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API