Legal Opinion
Gray v. Union Joint Stock Land Bank
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided June 28, 1939No. Nos. 8250-8252PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAMILTON, Circuit Judge.
These cases concern the proper construction of subsection (s) of Section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203(s).
Appellant Leona Piatt Gray owns an undivided five-eighths; her husband, appellant Carl H. Gray, a one-eighth; and appellant Ralph Piatt, her brother, a one-fourth interest in 165 acres of land in Logan County, Ohio.
On May 1, 1927, appellants became indebted to the Ohio-Pennsylvania Joint Stock Land Bank of Cleveland, Ohio, in the sum of $12,000, and executed a mortgage on the above farm to secure its payment, and also on 97.23 acres, adjoining. The…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Wright v. Vinton Branch of Mountain Trust Bank of RoanokeSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Tennessee Publishing Co. v. American National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Baxter v. Savings Bank of Utica, NYCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
- Borgelt v. BohneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. EgelakDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1959
- Morrison v. Federal Land Bank of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Gray v. Union Joint Stock Land Bank of DetroitSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- In re WiddersheimDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1939