Legal Opinion

Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. Davis

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided May 5, 1936No. 7966PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

Appellees are farmer debtors, who, when their homestead was about to be sold under a state foreclosure decree, applied in their pending bankruptcy proceedings for relief under subdivision (s) of section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as' amended August 28, 1935, 11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s). Appellant is the holder of the mortgage. Insisting that the amendment has not cured the defects in the statute pointed out in the Radford Case (Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. Radford), 295 U.S. 555, 55 S.Ct. 854, 79 L.Ed. 1593, 97 A.L.R. 1106, appellant moved for a dismissal of the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  4. Massachusetts v. MellonSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. RobertsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
  2. Carrigan v. California State LegislatureCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
  3. Wilson v. DeweyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  4. Bartels v. John Hancock Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  5. Cowherd v. Phœnix Joint Stock Land BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API