Henry v. Merguire
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Nevada County granting a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order granting the defendant’s motion for a new trial. The motion was made upon a statement of the case, and was granted upon the ground that “ the evidence is insufficient to justify the verdict of the jury and decision of the court.”
The first point made for a reversal is that the statement was not presented for settlement within the ten days prescribed by law, and hence it formed no legal basis to support the motion, and the order granting the motion was erroneous.
Upon this point the statement shows the following facts: “The proposed…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Connor v. S. Cal. Motor Rd. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
- Higgins v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
- Bunnel v. StocktonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stanton v. Superior Court of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Kaltschmidt v. WeberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. Van EwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Beach v. Spokane Ranch & Water Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1901
- Cameron v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.