Cameron v. Arcata & Mad River Railroad
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. S. M. Buck, F. A. Cutler, Chamberlin & Wheeler, and George D. Murray, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The plaintiffs are the surviving widow and infant child of Alexander D. Cameron, deceased, and recovered judgment herein against the defendant in the sum of ten thousand dollars damages for the death of the deceased, resulting from the negligence of the defendant. From this judgment and an order denying a new trial the defendant has appealed, bringing the case here upon the judgment-roll and a bill of exceptions. The respondents insist that the appellant is not entitled to have the bill of exceptions considered, for the reason that it was not prepared or served upon them within the time…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stonesifer v. KilburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Banta v. SillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Henry v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Bryan v. MaumeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1865
- Connor v. S. Cal. Motor Rd. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Hughes v. De MundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Kramm v. Stockton Electric R. R. Co.California Court of Appeal · 1913
- California National Bank v. El Dorado Lime & Minerals Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Lantz v. ValCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Freese v. FreeseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.