Legal Opinion

Connor v. S. Cal. Motor Rd. Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 1894No. 19269PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Haynes, C.—

Appeal from judgment and an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

It is conceded by appellant that the appeal from the judgment cannot be considered, because taken too late; and respondent contends that the appeal from the order denying a new trial cannot be considered upon its merits, because the statement was not settled within the time required by subdivision 3 of section 659 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

Appellant’s counsel did not notice the question in their opening brief, and, as no reply brief has been filed, we are without the benefit of any suggestions from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tregambo v. Comanche Mill & Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Higgins v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Wills v. Rhen KongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ursino v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Henry v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Cameron v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Kruger v. MerguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bank of Orland v. FinnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API