Legal Opinion

Meredith v. Ewing

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1882No. 9752PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Erom the Decatur Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

It is settled that one partner can not maintain an action against his co-partner for a share of the profits, upon a claim growing out of the partnership business, until there has been a final accounting and settlement. Page v. Thompson, 33 Ind. 137; Skillen v. Jones, 44 Ind. 136.

One partner may, however, maintain an action to compel an accounting, and to recover such sum as may be found due him upon the final adjustment of the partnership affairs. Briggs v. Daugherty, 48 Ind. 247.

A partner may compel the performance of an agreement of dissolution, and may recover a balance due him under the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Snyder v. BaberIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Skillen v. JonesIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Page v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  4. Briggs v. DaughertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Thompson v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Warring v. HillIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Miller v. RappIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Lang v. OppenheimIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Hanna v. McLaughlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API