Legal Opinion

Hanna v. McLaughlin

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 4, 1902No. 19,511PublishedCited by 13 opinions

From Jay Circuit Court; F. S. Caldwell, Special Judge. Suit by Samuel A. Hanna and others against Charles W. McLaughlin and wife for an accounting and the enforcement of a trust. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiffs appeal. Transferred from the Appellate Court, under §1337u Burns 1901.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

The appellants and the appellee, Charles W. McLaughlin, formed a supposed copartnership for the purpose of acting as the agents of one Fleming in finding a purchaser for property owned by Fleming. The firm was to advertise the property; all the expenses of the enterprise were to be borne equally by them; and the commissions they were to receive for making a sale were to be equally divided among the copartners. They found a purchaser, and the sale was effected. Their commissions amounted to $400 and were paid by Fleming to the appellee, Charles W. McLaughlin. He failed and refused to account…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warren v. . Union Bank of RochesterNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. State v. FosterWyoming Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Arnold v. . ArnoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  4. Midland National Bank of Kansas City v. BrightwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  5. Pearce v. DillIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Leeb v. Guy (In Re Guy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
  2. McGurk v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Gardner v. NewbertIndiana Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Ross v. THOMPSONIndiana Court of Appeals · 1957
  5. Adams v. CarmonyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API