Globe Indemnity Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtWhitaker, Judge
This is another case where the defendant has received the benefit of work done by the contractor on the order of defendant’s representatives in charge of the work, but refuses to pay for it because the contract requirements were not complied with. It is a case of hardship, but one in which this court is powerless to give relief because of the contractor’s failure to insist on compliance with the plain provisions of the contract relative to changes.
It is a suit by a surety on the contractor’s bond, which paid amounts due by the contractor on the contract. The surety claims the defendant is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. RiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- United States v. John McShain, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Diamond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
- Wisconsin Bridge & Iron Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
3Cited by7 opinions
- WRB Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- The Len Company and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- General Bronze Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Bgt Holdings LLC v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.