Legal Opinion

Griffiths v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 7, 1932No. K-35PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliams, Judge

The plaintiff brings suit on three items growing out of the performance of the contract aggregating $2,583.

The items are: (1) $1,500 damages for alleged delays caused by the defendant; (2) $33 alleged to be due on account of extra work; and, (3) $1,050 deducted by the defendant as liquidated damages.(1) Claim for $1,500 damages on account of delay in completing contract. — The contract provided that the work should be completed within 120 calendar days from the date of receipt of notice to begin work. The plaintiff received *255notice from the Director of the Veterans’ Bureau on September…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Plumley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Moran Bros. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  3. Chouteau v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1873
  4. Snare & Triest Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Wunderlich Contracting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1965
  2. The Len Company and Associates v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  3. B-W Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942
  4. Diamond v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  5. H. B. Nelson Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API