Legal Opinion

Leininger v. Pioneer National Latex

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 2007No. 2006-1304PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLanzinger, J.

{¶ 1} In this case, we accepted a discretionary appeal to determine whether a common-law tort claim exists for wrongful discharge based on the public policy against age discrimination expressed in R.C. Chapter 4112. In light of the full range of remedies provided in R.C. Chapter 4112, we hold that there is no such public policy tort.

Background

{¶ 2} Appellee, Marlene Leininger, filed a complaint against appellants, Pioneer National Latex, Jerry Meyer, and Melissa McCormic, alleging a single cause of action for wrongful termination of her employment in violation of Ohio’s public policy against…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Greeley v. Miami Valley Maintenance Contractors, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Mers v. Dispatch Printing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Kulch v. Structural Fibers, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Collins v. RizkanaOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Painter v. GraleyOhio Supreme Court · 1994

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. Jasper v. H. Nizam, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 2009
  2. Dohme v. Eurand America, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Sutton v. Tomco Machining, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Meyer v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 2009
  5. In re Estate of CentorbiOhio Supreme Court · 2011

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API