Legal Opinion

Collins v. Erdmann

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided April 7, 1937PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The finding, with such material corrections as are justified by the record, includes the following facts: William J. Worden, the grantor in the deed here in question, and his wife had lived for many years on the property conveyed, in Danbury. At the time of the execution of the deed he was about sixty-five years of age and a chronic alcoholic. His nearest relatives were first cousins. The defendant and her husband had been frequent visitors at his home for several years. During the fall of 1933 Mrs. Worden had been quite ill and the defendant, who is a domestic nurse, had frequently been at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dale's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  2. Preston v. PrestonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Addis v. GrangeIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Goldberg v. KrayeskeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  5. Chinigo v. EhrenbergSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Buol MacHine Co. v. BUCKENESSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  2. Francis v. HollauerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  3. Francis v. HollauerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1984
  4. Fritz v. MazurekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
  5. Reynolds v. MolitorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API