Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Mazurek

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 11, 1968PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThim, J.

In this action, the plaintiff sought cancelation of a quitclaim deed which she had executed on February 17, 1964, conveying an apartment building at 27-29 Woodside Circle in Middle-town to the named defendant, subject to a life estate in the plaintiff. The court concluded, inter alia, that the plaintiff had executed the aforementioned deed as a result of undue influence. The court rendered judgment for the plaintiff against the named defendant and for Mildred Frazier, the other defendant. The named defendant, hereinafter referred to as the defendant, has appealed.

The finding, which is not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Craig v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  2. Solari v. SeperakSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  3. Collins v. ErdmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  4. Goldstein v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Jones Destruction, Inc. v. UpjohnSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  2. Matter of Estate of MaherasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Covino v. PfefferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
  4. State v. CobuzziSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
  5. Peterson v. Town of OxfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API