Legal Opinion

Preston v. Preston

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 5, 1925PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKeeler, J.

We will first consider defendant’s appeal from the action of the Superior Court in setting aside the trust deed. The reason of appeal last summarized in the statement of facts, to the effect that the trial court erred in supplying, by its own conclusions from subordinate facts found in the report of the referee, certain ultimate facts, cannot be entertained by us. These conclusions are discovered by defendant’s counsel in the memorandum of decision filed by the trial judge. This memorandum is not a finding of facts. There is no finding of facts in the record, of which it has been made a part.…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Highberger v. StifflerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1864
  2. Towson v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  3. Dale's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1888
  4. Dalley v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  5. Noble's Adm'r v. Moses Bros.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1886

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Goller v. WhiteWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  2. United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  3. Rigdon Ex Rel. Rigdon v. RigdonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1971
  4. Veits v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1948
  5. McDonald v. Hartford Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API