Legal Opinion
Chinigo v. Ehrenberg
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 29, 1930PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBanks, J.
The plaintiffs entered into a written contract with the defendant in which they agreed to dig a cellar under a building owned and occupied by him in accordance with certain plans and specifications, for the contract price of $600. The specifications provided that the contractors should excavate the whole area under the building to a depth of seven feet and three inches, remove the old foundations and build in their place a new twelve-inch stone wall under the sills of the outer wall of the building, place fourteen steel columns to support the girders, and continue the chimneys down to the new…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- M. J. Daly & Sons, Inc. v. New Haven Hotel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1917
- Jordan v. ApterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Notkins v. PashalinskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Nocera v. LamattinaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Chariott v. McMullenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lach v. CahillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
- Nor'easter Group, Inc. v. Colossale Concrete, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Randolph Construction Co. v. Kings East CorporationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Union-May-Stern Company v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1954
- Bronson & Townsend Co. v. BattistoniSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.