Finney Outdoor Advertising Co. v. Cordeiro
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHEA, Justice.
The plaintiff, Finney Outdoor Advertising Co., Inc. (Finney), has appealed from a judgment entered in the Superior Court granting defendant, Ernest J. Cordeiro’s (Cordeiro) motion to dismiss under Rule 41(b)(2) of the Superior Court Rules of Civil Procedure for lack of prosecution. Finney contends that, notwithstanding the lack of prosecution for eleven years at the District Court level, the Superior Court trial justice abused his discretion in granting Cordeiro’s motion, thereby denying Finney its right to a trial. For the reasons hereinafter stated, we approve of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rodriques v. SantosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
- Abbey Medical/Abbey Rents, Inc. v. MignaccaSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
- Levy v. Industrial National Bank of Rhode IslandSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1970
- Perry Equipment Co. v. Marine Trading & Transportation, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
- Manton Industries, Inc. v. Providence Washington Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bergeron v. RoszkowskiSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Harvey v. Town of TivertonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Coates v. OCEAN STATE JOBBERS, INC.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- DeCarli v. WebberSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
- Val-Gioia Properties, LLC v. BlamiresSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.