Legal Opinion

Perry Equipment Co. v. Marine Trading & Transportation, Inc.

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided September 8, 1978PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant having failed to respond seasonably to plaintiff’s complaint initiating this action, a default judgment was entered in the Sixth District Court, Knox County, on March 18, 1977. The following October 5th, defendant moved the District Court, pursuant to Rule 60(b)(1), D.C.Civ.R., to set aside the default judgment on the grounds of excusable neglect. After a hearing, the trial Judge denied the motion. Defendant thereupon filed a timely appeal in the Superior Court, Rule 60(c), D.C.Civ.R., which, after a second hearing, was, in turn, denied.

Rule 60(c), D.C.Civ.R., states

A party…

2Cited by8 opinions

  1. Royal Coachman Color Guard v. Marine Trading & Transportation, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1979
  2. Finney Outdoor Advertising Co. v. CordeiroSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1984
  3. State v. CohenSuperior Court of Delaware · 1993
  4. John S. Zablotny v. State Board of NursingSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2014
  5. August Realty, Inc. v. Inhabitants of Town of YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API