Legal Opinion

Railroad v. Cabinet Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1900PublishedCited by 33 opinions

RROM MADISON. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Madison County. Levi S. Woods, J.

1Opinion of the CourtCai.dweui., J.

This is an action of damages by a shipper against a common carrier.

On the 26th of February, 1S98, the Southern Seating & Cabinet Company, of Jackson, Tenn., entered into a contract with W. A. R. Goodwin, rector to manufacture and put up certain pews in St. John’s Episcopal Church, at Petersburg, Ya., for the sum of $524. The contract contained a *570provision that the company “shall forfeit $10 per day for every day it fails to have pews in place after May 6, 1898,” but that provision was subsequently so changed as to waive the forfeiture if the pews should arrive at Petersburg by the third day…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Jaquith v. HudsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1858
  2. Bird v. RailroadsTennessee Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Tennessee Manufacturing Co. v. JamesTennessee Supreme Court · 1892
  4. McDonald v. Unaka Timber Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  5. East Tennessee, Virginia & Georgia Railroad v. HaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1886

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sun Printing and Publishing Assn. v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Airline Construction, Inc. v. BarrCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  3. V. L. Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment & Financial Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Chisholm & Moore Manufacturing Co. v. United States Canopy Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1903

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API