Legal Opinion

Sartain v. Dixie Coal & Iron Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Malone, Special Judge,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is a replevin hill for certain coal alleged to have been mined on the property of the complainant, Sartain.

Under answer and cross-bill, filed by the defendant, alleging the insolvency of complainant, etc., the chancel*637lor permitted a cross-replevin, and turned the coal over to the defendant, upon the execution of a sufficient forthcoming bond. This action, we may observe in passing, was plainly erroneous. Dearmon v. Blackburn (1853), 1 Sneed (Term.), 390, 392, 393, 60 Am. Dec., 160; 23 R. C. L., 881, 882.

As stated in the latter…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Stamper v. VenableTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  3. Tate v. TateTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. C. F. Simmons Medicine Co. v. Mansfield Drug Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1893

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Whitacre Partnership v. Biosignia, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Athanasios Konstantinidis and Vasiliki Konstantinidis, His Wife v. C. N. Chen, M. DCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  3. Long v. KnoxTexas Supreme Court · 1956
  4. D. M. Rose & Co. v. SnyderTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  5. Cracker Barrel Old Country Store, Inc. v. EppersonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API