Legal Opinion

New England Mut. Life Ins. v. Reece

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1935PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Geeen

These suits were brought against the commissioner of insurance and fiscal officers of the state to recover certain taxes paid by complainant under protest. From a decree for the complainant, the defendants have appealed.

Chapter 13 of the Public Acts of the Second Extra Session of 1931 (article 3, section 2), item 100' (a) and Revenue Acts of other years since 1895 have contained substantially the same provision as follows:

“. . . Life insurance corporations or companies of other States and foreign countries shall pay two and one-half percent on gross premium receipts from citizens of and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Manhattan Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Pitts v. Nashville Baseball ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Commonwealth v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
  4. German Alliance Insurance v. VanCleaveIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Chattanooga Plow Co. v. HaysTennessee Supreme Court · 1911

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Lakefront Realty Corp. v. LorenzIllinois Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Moskowitz v. Mayor & Council of WilmingtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1978
  3. Automobile Sales Co. v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Gallagher v. ButlerTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Hilliard v. ParkTennessee Supreme Court · 1963

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API