Legal Opinion

Southern Const. Co. v. Halliburton

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1923PublishedCited by 42 opinions

PROM HAWKINS. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hawkins County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari to the Court of Civil Appeals from the Supreme Court. — Hon. John Jennings, Jr., Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

The Southern Construction Company entered into a contract with the state, highway department for building certain roads in east Tennessee. A part of this work was sublet by the Southern Construction Company to Halliburton, another part to Baird, and another part to the Crump Construction Company. There are presented in these consolidated causes in this court various questions as to the liability of the Southern Construction Company and its surety for debts incurred by the aforesaid subcontractors — whether such debts are of a character to render the general contractor and its surety liable,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Tennessee Fertilizer Co. v. International Agr. Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  3. McDonald v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Cass v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Bailey v. DraneTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Gibson CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State Ex Rel. Wadsworth v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
  3. Third Nat. Bank v. American Equitable Ins. Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1943
  4. Draper v. Great American Insurance CompanyTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  5. American City Bank of Tullahoma v. Western Auto Supply Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1981

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API