Legal Opinion

Sowerwine v. Keith

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 2000No. 99-190PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellants J. Frederick Sowerwine (Fred) and Judy Sowerwine (Judy) appeal from the district court’s order granting a summary judgment in favor of Appellees Robert Keith (Robert) and Michele Keith (Michele).

We affirm.

ISSUES

The Sowerwines present a single issue for our review: “Whether Summary Judgment in Plaintiffs’ favor was proper.”

FACTS

In June of 1993, the Sowerwines decided to sell a piece of property consisting of approximately 183 acres which was adjacent to property owned by the Keiths. Fred communicated his intention to sell the land to an employee of the Keiths who…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wolter v. Equitable Resources Energy Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Frost Construction Co. v. Lobo, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Kirkwood v. Cuna Mutual Ins. SocietyWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Patel v. HarlessWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Romero v. SchulzeWyoming Supreme Court · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Birt v. Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Parkhurst v. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Hunter v. ReeceWyoming Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Markstein v. Countryside I, L.L.C.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Three Way, Inc. v. Burton Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2008

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API