Legal Opinion

Wolter v. Equitable Resources Energy Co.

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 14, 1999No. 98-299PublishedCited by 55 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MACY, Justice.

Appellants George Wolter, Jr., Margarite Wolter, Wolter Oil Company, the William L. Hershelman Trust, Ann Cunningham, Mary Ann Reinhardt, Jerry Busch, and Elizabeth Kessler (hereinafter referred to as the royalty owners) appeal from the district court’s order which granted a partial summary judgment in favor of Appellee Equitable Resources Energy Company, Western Region.

We affirm.

ISSUES

The royalty owners present the following issues for our consideration:

A. Did the District Court err in not granting the Royalty Owners summary judgment on the issue of whether the Roy alty Owners…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. True Oil Co. v. Sinclair Oil Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Farr v. LinkWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
  3. State v. Pennzoil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Moncrief v. HarveyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Kirkwood v. Cuna Mutual Ins. SocietyWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by55 opinions

  1. Ultra Resources, Inc. v. HartmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Cline v. Rocky Mountain, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Caballo Coal Company v. Fidelity Exploration & Production CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. McLean v. Hyland Enterprises, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State Department of Corrections v. WattsWyoming Supreme Court · 2008

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API